Over the years various regulations have been put in place to protect children from being taken advantage of by marketers. Personally, I think they are fair game because it ultimately comes down to the parents who must make the right decision.
People are have been especially targeting the marketing tactics of fast food restaurants like McDonalds by saying they are unfairly targeting children and having a direct impact on childhood obesity.
McDonald’s responded a few years ago and did a great thing by deciding to join the Better Business Bureau’s Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative with companies such as Kellogg, Kraft, PepsiCo and Burger King.
They have limited their marketing to children in major ways. Now, National commercials geared toward children under twelve only feature meals that meet specific nutrition criteria consistent with healthy dietary choices (no more than 600 calories, no more than 35% of calories from fat and 10% of calories from saturated fat, and no more than 35% total sugar by weight).
People still don’t think that’s enough.
A few days ago, the city of San Francisco voted and preliminarily passed a law that limits toy givaways in children’s meals that have excessive calories, sodium and fat, making the city the country’s first to take such action.
It made certain fast food restaurant owners angry. “Somehow the San Francisco Board of Supervisors just took the happy out of Happy Meals,” said Scott Rodrick, who owns 10 McDonald’s franchises in San Francisco. “It would be an understatement to say how disappointed I am with this legislation.” Rodrick said parents, not legislators, should decide what their children eat.
If this law gets passed officially and more cities and states begin following, it could change the way restaurants like McDonalds and Burger King market to children drastically. What do you think about the new legislation?
For more information on the law visit this link:
http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/News/Daily/Pages/ND1104104.aspx